“Old Polarities”

An opinion piece in the summer edition of Silviculture Magazine argues that both sides of the timber supply dispute trivialize the inherent complexities involved in managing the forest:  “To propose logging sensitive areas to mitigate timber supply is driven by short-term thinking.  And the opposing position, that these areas are off limits, is animated by ideology more than a careful observation of events on the ground.”
The silvicultural perspective offered here regarding “the fallacy of static reserves” broadens understanding.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s